MANILA, Philippines — Farmers’ group Samahang Industriya ng Agrikultura (SINAG) chairman Rosendo S o maintained that there is no need to give additional power to the National Food Authority as he opposed proposals to allow the NFA to import rice.
So said the NFA failed to use its P8-billion budget for palay procurement last year, so the agency has P17 billion this year which it can use to procure 566,666 metric tons of palay or 351,333 MT of rice.
“This is good for 10 days, or more th an the required nine days buffer stock,” So said.
He added that while SINAG backed amendments of the Rice Tariffication Law or Republic Act 11203, it should only cover the increase in the funding allocated under the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund from the current P10 billion to P30 billion.
“These include P12 billion for cash assistance to farmers tilling three hectares; P6 billion for inbred rice seed, development and propagation; P7 billion for rice farm machineries; P3 billion loan from Landbank and Development Bank of the Philippines; P1 billion for expended rice credit assistance and rice extension services,” So said.
The RTL has nothing to do with the spike in the retail price of rice and the flooding of imported rice in the market, he said.
“If the government wants to sell rice at P30 per kilo, it can be done but it needs to be subsidized by at l east P20 to P22 per kilo,” he said.
Meanwhile, Speaker Martin Romualdez said House Bill 10381 or the move to amend certain provisions in the RTL is aimed at making “high-quality rice affordable” to every Filipino.
This “marks a significant stride towards strengthening our rice industry and ensuring broader access to affordable, high-quality rice for all,” he said.
“This bill is not just a policy change; it is a powerful pledge to every Filipino. We are committed to ensuring that rice – our staple food – remains affordable and accessible to all,” Romualdez said.
HB 10381 was approved overwhelmingly through a voice vote in plenary session, whose objective is to amend provisions in the five-year-old RTL and bring back the power of NFA to import as well as sell the staple in the market.
Rep. Mark Enverga, chairman of the House committee on agriculture and food security, assured the senators and the public in general that they definitely have “safeguards” in restoring the power of the NFA in helping stabilize the price of rice.
“In fact, NFA will have a very limited presence here – only in case of emergency situations and importation is merely a last resort,” Enverga explained, assuaging fears raised by Sen. Cynthia Villar about the risks of giving back the power to NFA, which may be abused.
On the other hand, House Deputy Speaker David Suarez and Rep. Jude Acidre expressed hope the Senate will change its mind about giving the power back to NFA, citing the history of corruption the agency had in previous administrations.
“Let’s not forget this is not an issue of corruption, but rather an issue of food security and price of rice and we should bring our attention to the main agenda, which is the price of rice, which is food security, that should be our focus,” Suarez said.
For his part, Finance Secretary Ralph Recto also backed the proposal to amend the RTL, specifically returning the powers of the NFA to help in price stabilization.
“Maybe we can tweak it a bit to allow NFA [to buy and sell] for emergency purposes,” he said.
President Marcos has expressed his intention to certify RTL amendments as urgent.
Earlier this week, the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF) also bucked moves to bring back NFA powers, emphasizing that this would reverse reforms achieved by the RTL.
FEF maintained that higher rice prices are due to factors beyond the control of the RTL such as the Ukraine-Russia conflict, export ban of India and the intensifying conflict in the Middle East.
As of last month, rice inflation eased, but remained elevated at 23.9 percent.
“We want to reduce rice prices and I think global prices will be going down by September,” Recto said. – Louise Maureen Simeon, Delon Porcalla
MANILA, Philippines — The Philippine National Police (PNP) vowed to support the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) in its probe on the alleged wiretapping activities of the Chinese embassy.
PNP information officer Col. Jean Fajardo said they are ready to give assistance in the NBI investigation, which was ordered by Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla.
Remulla issued the order after the Chinese embassy released a transcript of an alleged conversation between its diplomat and former Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Western Command (Wescom) chief Vice Admiral Alberto Carlos.
The conversation, which supposedly occurred last Jan. 3, is about a “new model” for managing the dispute between the two sides on the Ayungin Shoal.
Chinese embassy officials, along with defense and security officials, would be invited by a Senate panel that would investigate, in aid of legislation, the alleged wiretapping against Carlos, which is considered a serious breach of existing international law for a foreign embassy.
In an interview, Sen. Francis Tolentino said the invitation was anchored on his Senate Resolution 1023, calling for the Senate committee on national defense chaired by Sen. Jinggoy Estrada to conduct inquiry.
Tolentino clarified that regardless of the outcome of the Senate investigation, the content would be extraneous from the NBI investigation. “We only want to know if there was wiretapping.”
He said that depending on the findings of the investigation, all embassy personnel, including non-diplomatic personnel, clerical staff, cooks and drivers who were given visas could have these canceled and they would be sent home.
“It can lead to a downsizing of the Chinese embassy in Metro Manila, it depends on what can be proven,” he said.
“They can be declared persona non grata, or they could be sent home. I would not preempt the Department of Foreign Affairs’ action, it can lead to the DFA calling for the reduction in the size of personnel of the embassy,” he added.
He said that downsizing an embassy would be a first. “The Chinese embassy has consulate offices in Cebu, Davao and surprisingly they have a consulate in Ilocos Norte,” he said.
Under Republic Act 4200 or the Anti-Wiretapping Act, it is unlawful for any person not authorized by the parties to any private communication or spoken word to record conversations.
The resolution noted that on May 6, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian spoke at a press conference and said China has repeatedly negotiated with the Philippines’ AFP WesCom to discuss a “new model” for the West Philippine Sea (WPS) and that the Philippine military has confirmed that it had been approved by the entire command chain, including the Philippines’ defense ministry and national security adviser.
“On May 7, China has likewise threatened to release the transcript and audio recording of an alleged phone conversation that happened on Jan. 3 between Chinese officials and Carlos wherein the latter allegedly agreed to a ‘new model’ in handling resupply missions to the BRP Sierra Madre,” the resolution added.
“On the same day, the DFA issued a statement emphasizing that only the Philippine President can approve or authorize agreements entered into by the Philippine government on matters pertaining to the WPS,” the resolution added. “In this respect, the DFA can confirm that no Cabinet-level official of the Marcos administration has agreed to any Chinese proposal pertaining to the Ayungin Shoal.”
The resolution added that AFP chief Romeo Brawner Jr., one of the high-ranking officers mentioned in the wiretapped conversation, vehemently denied agreeing to such a model.
The resolution noted China’s claim of an audio recording allegedly between Carlos and a Chinese diplomat does not merit significant concern as it appears to be a malign influence effort from the Chinese Communist Party.
“Transcripts can easily be fabricated and audio recordings can be manufactured by using deepfakes. These reports only aim to serve as a distraction from the China Coast Guard’s ongoing aggressive behavior in the WPS,” the resolution said.
Meanwhile, Bureau of Immigration (BI) spokesperson Dana Sandoval said they have not received any request for information on Chinese individuals who may be linked to the alleged wiretapping operations of the Chinese embassy.
“So far, it is not in our radar. (There is no) information about that or request for data of those involved in this case. But we are closely monitoring this and the BI database is ready to share information if they need details about specific individuals related to this case,” she said during the Kapihan sa Manila Bay forum yesterday. – Cecille Suerte Felipe, Delon Porcalla, Evelyn Macairan